I have a rental management company manage my house in Colorado. I live in CA. When my previous tenant moved out, the management reported to me that the tenant's dog chewed the blinds, and to replace it, will cost $300. The management used their security deposit to cover this damage, and send me $300.
I put the house for sale right after the tenant moved out. During the price negotiation, I agreed to give the buyer $300 as blinds credit.
Later on, the tenant claimed that the damaged blinds were actually their own blinds, they took down my original blinds and installed their own blinds, but they did not take the damaged blinds down when they left the house. The tenant asked me to return the $300.
Management told me that Colorado law allows for treble damages (three times the amount) if there is a wrongful withholding of a security deposit.
My question is if the management is responsible for providing wrong information. I only gave the buyer blinds credit based on the belief that the tenant's security deposit will be passed on to the buyer clean.
If the tenant sues, should they sue the management company, not me ?
I put the house for sale right after the tenant moved out. During the price negotiation, I agreed to give the buyer $300 as blinds credit.
Later on, the tenant claimed that the damaged blinds were actually their own blinds, they took down my original blinds and installed their own blinds, but they did not take the damaged blinds down when they left the house. The tenant asked me to return the $300.
Management told me that Colorado law allows for treble damages (three times the amount) if there is a wrongful withholding of a security deposit.
My question is if the management is responsible for providing wrong information. I only gave the buyer blinds credit based on the belief that the tenant's security deposit will be passed on to the buyer clean.
If the tenant sues, should they sue the management company, not me ?
Comment