Hello from California.
I am having issues with the tenants I subleased to. They signed a written contract and are now trying to back out of it. I'm not sure how binding their contract is because I recently found out that I am not actually allowed to sublease my apartment. The contract I signed with apartment office had a section that briefly mentioned how subleasing was not allowed. Since the entire contract I received from the office was over 20 pages, I didn't read each page carefully, so I didn't notice that subleasing was not allowed. So I subleased my place and had the tenants sign a sublease contract. Now they're violating several of the clauses of the sublease contract. Thus, I ultimately want to know, how legally binding is this sublease contract if I'm technically not legally allowed to sublease?
I am having issues with the tenants I subleased to. They signed a written contract and are now trying to back out of it. I'm not sure how binding their contract is because I recently found out that I am not actually allowed to sublease my apartment. The contract I signed with apartment office had a section that briefly mentioned how subleasing was not allowed. Since the entire contract I received from the office was over 20 pages, I didn't read each page carefully, so I didn't notice that subleasing was not allowed. So I subleased my place and had the tenants sign a sublease contract. Now they're violating several of the clauses of the sublease contract. Thus, I ultimately want to know, how legally binding is this sublease contract if I'm technically not legally allowed to sublease?
Comment