A sole proprietor with no employees works 500 hrs in a new business in the 1st year. He takes no draws during this 1st year, and instead keeps the money working in the business. He has no formal written document stating how or when he will be paid, but he is aware he can take a draw at any time.
He is not avoiding draws to avoid paying taxes, as HE KNOWS he has to pay taxes on net profits regardless of draws, but rather to grow his business more quickly.
Given these set of facts, is there a universal way the law views what his status is in-fact? For example, b/c he has no written document on payment, but worked 500 hrs, would the law deem he has deferred compensation of least the applicable minimum wage multiplied by 500 hours?
He is not avoiding draws to avoid paying taxes, as HE KNOWS he has to pay taxes on net profits regardless of draws, but rather to grow his business more quickly.
Given these set of facts, is there a universal way the law views what his status is in-fact? For example, b/c he has no written document on payment, but worked 500 hrs, would the law deem he has deferred compensation of least the applicable minimum wage multiplied by 500 hours?
Comment