Tweet
Paternity Fraud/Children For profit
In 1985 at the age of 19,easily mislead and a child by
experience my self I was coerced by the means of fraud
into a marriage, with the one thing most hold dearly
to there hearts, the privilege of child birth and
becoming a parent to pass on the heritage of the
family tree, that generations before have held the
pride of being part of.
over a period of the next 5 years, I was striped of
the privilege that in fact is a god given gift. The
freedom of my next 20 years was in the hands of many
that would determine literally my destiny at there
will by opinion and discretion. I HAVE NOW BEEN PLACED
IN THE HANDS OF THE SYSTEM, The Bay County Friend Of
The Court, commonly referred to as the FOC, I soon
came to realize it was (FAILURE OF THE CHILDREN).
With 2 children being born into, but not products of
the marriage, I soon began the quest to protect the
right of my family heritage, and the best interest of
both children. The conception of fraud is unfair to
all.
Because of LAWS and POWERS the judge holds to
determine what is best for My children I was told you
can not see your children. Your visitation rights are
terminated, all because of his personal opinion, as he
demonstrated on the record by referring to his own
family heritage and children.
while holding confidence in my hired counsel I was
lead to make some bad choices through out the
proceedings of the divorce by his recommendation,
keeping in mind, He was the 3rd attorney on the record
in this case as I was denied the right to an attorney
by the judge prior to retaining his firm.
I was never charged with domestic violence, never
charged with child abuse, the only thing that could be
said, Is Mr Richardson is confused about his
decisions.WHO WOULD NOT BE, finding out that there
beliefs are nothing more then a facade of ones
fraudulent ways, every thing you believed in was only
created in another,s mind.
So by his opinion and his unlimited discretion, I was
ordered astray of a child that was my biological son
of just 2 years old, and entitled to be part of my
family heritage. and to financially care for a child
holding my personal name only Douglas Richardson while
the mother was set free to live abroad with the blood
father of the non-biological child that was determined
to be my legal responsibility at the age of 5 as
defined best interest of the child.
Enslaved over the next 15 years, from the deceit of a
woman altering morality at the cost of my freedoms I
am now nothing more then a number on the books of a
collection agency, the friend of the court.
Over this period of time, while being fully engulfed
with emotions of having a SON out there in the care of
another man whom holds absolutely no interest in my
family heritage I set my self aside, continue on with
the struggles of life holding the faith all will come
to pass.
Some 10 years later The mother determines she has
tired of being a mom, abandons BOTH children in the
house hold of the man she has striped me of my
freedoms with deceit, to live with as a family and
deceived both children into believing I walked away
from them by the means of my own decisions, claiming
to them I am a dead beat father.
Growing older and much wiser, holding grave concerns
to the future of both of these children,s lives, I
starting refocusing on the entire process that has
unfolded over the last 15 years.
I am forced to go back to square one and file a motion
in court representing my self to force open the doors
that were literally slammed in my face 15 years
earlier. Having a lot of ground to cover I start
investigating court files, pulling all information
from the County clerks office and the friend of the
courts files Copying, and putting in sequence.
Keeping in mind, I am limiting my search to certain
documents because the decisions of the courts whom
held authority over these childrens lives was based
off the best interest of the child, as stated in
court.
The very first thing I begin to research is how the
courts could acknowledge the mother moved out of the
house, and can with out a notification to me the legal
father of both, order the payments I am making go
directly to this man, The biological father of the
first child whom I hold all parental rights and
responsibilities too as ordered by the courts
themselves.
I find by Michigan law a hearing and investigation
must take place to protect my parental rights and the
best interest of the child. It clearly states it must
beyond a shadow of a doubt be in the best interest of
the children, to have the children reside with a 3rd
parte and under his care, and must hold legal
authority to not only care for the children, but in
fact receive the payments I was making.
While researching abatement and redirection of child
support, I find this was done with out a hearing,and
no investigation what so ever, I find in a motion
filed by the friend of the court, it was taken to the
chief judge, whom holds authority over the friend of
the courts operations stating they had received my
verbal consent, but when I ask them to show me any
form of notification to me, one can not be produced,as
they claim its archived.
I am very skeptical now of all, I start looking at the
whole picture while talking to the receptionist at the
Bay County Clerks office, once again looking for some
kind of notification to me, or a hearing that took
place, as she opens the files on Abraham Flores doing
a reverse check for a hearing he may have attended
being the 3rd parte payee.
The file she presented to me was a felony police
report, she said I would have to go to the circuit
court clerk to visually see the report. She also
informed me of a report I may view on the mother of
the case containing a PPO order she had filed.
With the Circuit court clerks office ( records) within
20 foot of the friend of the courts doors I am alarmed
to find in the records a report and plea conviction
against the man the courts found fit to care for these
children with out the mother being present in the
home.
The charges were Count 1 Felony with a fire arms and
count 2 Assault with a dangerous weapon. In the 27
page report I find testimony from several people
including one of the children, The Assault occurred at
the home of this family, the Assault was literally
against this family as he held and threatened there
lives with a high caliber riffle to the extent of the
childrens testimony stating he would kill every
one.He as well held the police at bay before
surrendering him self to there custody.
I also found this happened prior to the mother
abandoning the children as the courts acknowledged in
written correspondence. This man had no authority to
legally care for the children, he held no parental
rights and had proved to be a threat to there best
interest, to the extent of threatening there lives at
gun point, They were left in an environment of
physical
dangers.
On March 23rd, 2006 after filing a motion to rehear
the case it was agreed and determined that all
payments to the mother and 3rd parte payee would be
terminated, arrears in the amount of $117.00 to the
3rd parte payee, and approximately $2000 to the mother
would be wiped out. It was also ordered that I WOULD
have to reimburse the state of Michigan approximately
$1500 for welfare received and court statutory fees
by both the 3rd parte payee and the mother.
It was also ordered with out question My visitation
rights to my biological child be immediately
reinstated.
Still having unanswered questions, and new issues that
were brought to my attention during the March 23rd
hearing I deemed it extremely important to continue
investigating all issues in the case.
On the record my ex-wife made the statements she has
continued to have the children on Medicaid, a service
offered by the Michigan department of human services,
that is tailored under welfare reform Title 4D. When
in fact I have had these children on a policy of Blue
Cross & Blue Shield as recognized by the courts them
selves. The friend of the courts office several times
over the years have retained Insurance cards from me
for the children also recognized by the courts.
I also have many times over the years received
statements from Blue Cross Blue Shield showing the
Policy was being used by the mother holding the
Insurance cards as I was billed for the deductibles
that she her self was ordered responsible to pay in
the judgment of divorce, while she on March 23rd
maintained she has never had Blue Cross Blue Shield
coverage supplied to her. She was in fact using
Medicaid as a primary insurance coverage, fully
knowing the Blue Cross Policy existed.
This Directed my attention to a new avenue, being I
was even on March 23rd ordered to reimburse the state
of Michigan for the services received on this case
that included The Medicaid policy.
I exercised my rights to the freedom of information
act to retain the history of welfare reform services
received in this case. In the information I received
from the Michigan Department of human services, it
clearly recognizes the mother from the dates of 2001
to 2005 was not in possession of these children, and
they were in fact living in the domicile under the
care of Abraham Flores, The 3rd parte to the case,
Whom was receiving the payments of child support. It
also recognized in their files as stated to me in a
separate document that the mother in the year of 2003
had the children on and was receiving services
supplied by the state of Michigan for cash assistance
and food stamps.
As law would enforce ignorance to the law is no
excuse,It is clearly Spelled out and documented in the
files of the Michigan Department of human services
that there was no entitlement for the state to receive
federal funding for the reimbursement of title 4D, And
the mother knowingly applied and received services
offer by the state of Michigan for food stamps, cash
assistance and Medical coverage in the form of
Medicaid.
All files retained on hand by Mr Douglas Richardson
are formally being submitted to this United States
Attorneys office for further investigation, for the
receipt of Federal funding under fraudulent claims and
welfare fraud.
Sincerely
Mr Douglas M Richardson
709 McDonnell
Essexville Mi 48732
Home 989-893-4717
Cell 989-714-9359
As you can see, There are several issues involved, I am not looking to go after the mother or 3rd parte. I am looking at holding the state and county accountible for the damage they have done. I am looking for an attorney on a contingency basis, I would like to sue for my youngest child as well being he has not yet emancipted. Any help or direction would be greatfully appreciated.
experience my self I was coerced by the means of fraud
into a marriage, with the one thing most hold dearly
to there hearts, the privilege of child birth and
becoming a parent to pass on the heritage of the
family tree, that generations before have held the
pride of being part of.
over a period of the next 5 years, I was striped of
the privilege that in fact is a god given gift. The
freedom of my next 20 years was in the hands of many
that would determine literally my destiny at there
will by opinion and discretion. I HAVE NOW BEEN PLACED
IN THE HANDS OF THE SYSTEM, The Bay County Friend Of
The Court, commonly referred to as the FOC, I soon
came to realize it was (FAILURE OF THE CHILDREN).
With 2 children being born into, but not products of
the marriage, I soon began the quest to protect the
right of my family heritage, and the best interest of
both children. The conception of fraud is unfair to
all.
Because of LAWS and POWERS the judge holds to
determine what is best for My children I was told you
can not see your children. Your visitation rights are
terminated, all because of his personal opinion, as he
demonstrated on the record by referring to his own
family heritage and children.
while holding confidence in my hired counsel I was
lead to make some bad choices through out the
proceedings of the divorce by his recommendation,
keeping in mind, He was the 3rd attorney on the record
in this case as I was denied the right to an attorney
by the judge prior to retaining his firm.
I was never charged with domestic violence, never
charged with child abuse, the only thing that could be
said, Is Mr Richardson is confused about his
decisions.WHO WOULD NOT BE, finding out that there
beliefs are nothing more then a facade of ones
fraudulent ways, every thing you believed in was only
created in another,s mind.
So by his opinion and his unlimited discretion, I was
ordered astray of a child that was my biological son
of just 2 years old, and entitled to be part of my
family heritage. and to financially care for a child
holding my personal name only Douglas Richardson while
the mother was set free to live abroad with the blood
father of the non-biological child that was determined
to be my legal responsibility at the age of 5 as
defined best interest of the child.
Enslaved over the next 15 years, from the deceit of a
woman altering morality at the cost of my freedoms I
am now nothing more then a number on the books of a
collection agency, the friend of the court.
Over this period of time, while being fully engulfed
with emotions of having a SON out there in the care of
another man whom holds absolutely no interest in my
family heritage I set my self aside, continue on with
the struggles of life holding the faith all will come
to pass.
Some 10 years later The mother determines she has
tired of being a mom, abandons BOTH children in the
house hold of the man she has striped me of my
freedoms with deceit, to live with as a family and
deceived both children into believing I walked away
from them by the means of my own decisions, claiming
to them I am a dead beat father.
Growing older and much wiser, holding grave concerns
to the future of both of these children,s lives, I
starting refocusing on the entire process that has
unfolded over the last 15 years.
I am forced to go back to square one and file a motion
in court representing my self to force open the doors
that were literally slammed in my face 15 years
earlier. Having a lot of ground to cover I start
investigating court files, pulling all information
from the County clerks office and the friend of the
courts files Copying, and putting in sequence.
Keeping in mind, I am limiting my search to certain
documents because the decisions of the courts whom
held authority over these childrens lives was based
off the best interest of the child, as stated in
court.
The very first thing I begin to research is how the
courts could acknowledge the mother moved out of the
house, and can with out a notification to me the legal
father of both, order the payments I am making go
directly to this man, The biological father of the
first child whom I hold all parental rights and
responsibilities too as ordered by the courts
themselves.
I find by Michigan law a hearing and investigation
must take place to protect my parental rights and the
best interest of the child. It clearly states it must
beyond a shadow of a doubt be in the best interest of
the children, to have the children reside with a 3rd
parte and under his care, and must hold legal
authority to not only care for the children, but in
fact receive the payments I was making.
While researching abatement and redirection of child
support, I find this was done with out a hearing,and
no investigation what so ever, I find in a motion
filed by the friend of the court, it was taken to the
chief judge, whom holds authority over the friend of
the courts operations stating they had received my
verbal consent, but when I ask them to show me any
form of notification to me, one can not be produced,as
they claim its archived.
I am very skeptical now of all, I start looking at the
whole picture while talking to the receptionist at the
Bay County Clerks office, once again looking for some
kind of notification to me, or a hearing that took
place, as she opens the files on Abraham Flores doing
a reverse check for a hearing he may have attended
being the 3rd parte payee.
The file she presented to me was a felony police
report, she said I would have to go to the circuit
court clerk to visually see the report. She also
informed me of a report I may view on the mother of
the case containing a PPO order she had filed.
With the Circuit court clerks office ( records) within
20 foot of the friend of the courts doors I am alarmed
to find in the records a report and plea conviction
against the man the courts found fit to care for these
children with out the mother being present in the
home.
The charges were Count 1 Felony with a fire arms and
count 2 Assault with a dangerous weapon. In the 27
page report I find testimony from several people
including one of the children, The Assault occurred at
the home of this family, the Assault was literally
against this family as he held and threatened there
lives with a high caliber riffle to the extent of the
childrens testimony stating he would kill every
one.He as well held the police at bay before
surrendering him self to there custody.
I also found this happened prior to the mother
abandoning the children as the courts acknowledged in
written correspondence. This man had no authority to
legally care for the children, he held no parental
rights and had proved to be a threat to there best
interest, to the extent of threatening there lives at
gun point, They were left in an environment of
physical
dangers.
On March 23rd, 2006 after filing a motion to rehear
the case it was agreed and determined that all
payments to the mother and 3rd parte payee would be
terminated, arrears in the amount of $117.00 to the
3rd parte payee, and approximately $2000 to the mother
would be wiped out. It was also ordered that I WOULD
have to reimburse the state of Michigan approximately
$1500 for welfare received and court statutory fees
by both the 3rd parte payee and the mother.
It was also ordered with out question My visitation
rights to my biological child be immediately
reinstated.
Still having unanswered questions, and new issues that
were brought to my attention during the March 23rd
hearing I deemed it extremely important to continue
investigating all issues in the case.
On the record my ex-wife made the statements she has
continued to have the children on Medicaid, a service
offered by the Michigan department of human services,
that is tailored under welfare reform Title 4D. When
in fact I have had these children on a policy of Blue
Cross & Blue Shield as recognized by the courts them
selves. The friend of the courts office several times
over the years have retained Insurance cards from me
for the children also recognized by the courts.
I also have many times over the years received
statements from Blue Cross Blue Shield showing the
Policy was being used by the mother holding the
Insurance cards as I was billed for the deductibles
that she her self was ordered responsible to pay in
the judgment of divorce, while she on March 23rd
maintained she has never had Blue Cross Blue Shield
coverage supplied to her. She was in fact using
Medicaid as a primary insurance coverage, fully
knowing the Blue Cross Policy existed.
This Directed my attention to a new avenue, being I
was even on March 23rd ordered to reimburse the state
of Michigan for the services received on this case
that included The Medicaid policy.
I exercised my rights to the freedom of information
act to retain the history of welfare reform services
received in this case. In the information I received
from the Michigan Department of human services, it
clearly recognizes the mother from the dates of 2001
to 2005 was not in possession of these children, and
they were in fact living in the domicile under the
care of Abraham Flores, The 3rd parte to the case,
Whom was receiving the payments of child support. It
also recognized in their files as stated to me in a
separate document that the mother in the year of 2003
had the children on and was receiving services
supplied by the state of Michigan for cash assistance
and food stamps.
As law would enforce ignorance to the law is no
excuse,It is clearly Spelled out and documented in the
files of the Michigan Department of human services
that there was no entitlement for the state to receive
federal funding for the reimbursement of title 4D, And
the mother knowingly applied and received services
offer by the state of Michigan for food stamps, cash
assistance and Medical coverage in the form of
Medicaid.
All files retained on hand by Mr Douglas Richardson
are formally being submitted to this United States
Attorneys office for further investigation, for the
receipt of Federal funding under fraudulent claims and
welfare fraud.
Sincerely
Mr Douglas M Richardson
709 McDonnell
Essexville Mi 48732
Home 989-893-4717
Cell 989-714-9359
As you can see, There are several issues involved, I am not looking to go after the mother or 3rd parte. I am looking at holding the state and county accountible for the damage they have done. I am looking for an attorney on a contingency basis, I would like to sue for my youngest child as well being he has not yet emancipted. Any help or direction would be greatfully appreciated.
Comment