Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Federal Oaths of Allegiance Act CANADA

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Federal Oaths of Allegiance Act CANADA

    Has the Westminster Confession of Faith 1648 from the British Parliament been repealed? (CH 22 Lawful Oaths). Is the word "do" in the wording important? I have found a discrepancy in the CANADA Oaths of Allegiance Act and the Alberta Oaths of Allegiance Act and I wonder if an oath taken that is somehow deficient is valid in law?? Come on now, do not be shy, you can tell me.....Seriously, if there is one among you with the honour that the profession demands, the answer should be simple indeed. Get back to me. (CANADA law.)

  • #2
    Re: Federal Oaths of Allegiance Act CANADA

    The oath taken is not invalid, though many have tried to assert so.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Federal Oaths of Allegiance Act CANADA

      How can the oath NOT be invalid?! Removing the word "do" from the oath makes it grammatically incoherent! This was done intentionally by the law society...Your Honour....Interesting how I always get a reply back from someone who hides their information and refuses to come up with any supporting evidence to back their claim that it IS, indeed valid. "Yes it is" is NOT supporting evidence, it is dictatorship indoctrination...Clearly, to me, it is as I stand on the issue at hand...The oath is bogus until PROVEN otherwise...Unsubstantiated claims from people afraid to reveal even a user name will not be admissible as evidence in this relevant issue unless the information is actually valid, that is.....Come on......This is a lawyer's forum...I, for one, would like a valid answer to my original question...Does the removal of the word "do" from an oath or vow make it invalid? Try to get married without saying the word "do". How far would you get?? Hmmmm? Any takers?

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Federal Oaths of Allegiance Act CANADA

        No takers eh? Somehow this does not surprise me... The oath IS invalid and has no force of law...the courts are proceeding in fraud and treason which is trying to overthrow Her Majesty's government.....That being the King James version of the Bible...by force. The entire government being de facto in nature makes all courts de facto by proxy. I feel compelled to notify everyone that Justices and lawyers that sit in any court are criminally responsible for actions that are not specifically allowed by Her Majesty's Royal Style, that being the Defender of the Faith. I am aware that these are strong allegations.....Prove me WRONG!! All you lawyers out there, all you Judges out there, HAVE you any PROOF to the contrary? Keep in mind, I am in Canada, being a Constitutional Monarchy.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Federal Oaths of Allegiance Act CANADA

          I did not think so.....Ha Ha Ha.....Afraid of the light, are you? Afraid the general public might catch on to your fraud game involving legal fictions called persons, are you? Afraid you are, and if not yet, you will be......You will be....just remember... the state can not fund private matters. so when you lose your collective shirts that you all stole from the good, all be they stupid, sheeple remember when you used to have a house, boat, nice car etc...It will help with the redemption process. PEACE OUT!!! Spread the word every one. They are afraid.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Federal Oaths of Allegiance Act CANADA

            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
            The oath taken is not invalid, though many have tried to assert so.
            ...

            Get by this you quack!! allcreatorsgifts: Alberta has a bogus oath!

            You will find that every provinces provincial court judges prosecutors and lawyers have sworn false oaths... A discovery of this nature cannot be ignored no matter how large the group of men and women bearing false oaths there is.
            Oaths of Allegiance Act
            Section 126 of the criminal Code is being Violated!! The Governor Generals act of 1947 section 11 http://www.gg.ca/pdf/LettersPatent1947.pdf is being violated... The BNAA Schedule 5 is being violated http://www.gg.ca/pdf/LettersPatent1947.pdf ...I provided you that so you can easily brush off any attempt at saying the Federal Oaths of allegiance Act does not apply to judges.

            Section 22 of the Westminster Confession of Faith is applicable to all!! Remember this is law never repealed and in force today!! EPCEW | Resources | Westminster Confession of Faith | Chapter XXII

            Saskatchewan's oath for Judges lawyers and prosecutors is not even remotely close to the lawful prescribed oath in the Federal Oaths of Allegiance Act that the Interpretation Act back up as applicable upon all provincial and federal justice employee's and British Columbia in a Schizophrenic effort has split up the valid oath to the superior courts with the lower provincial court judges being without a valid oath at all... Alberta omitted the word "do" which any grammer expert in the queens English destroys the sentence structure. It is violation of law and a bogus oath!!

            When you see what is happening Canada wide you realize this is not an oversite. Attempting to overthrow her majesty's government with false oathed judges and lawyers violating her sacred duty to defend the laws of God with all of her power by intentionally intimidating men and women to bow to and submit to laws added to God's law in violation of God's command regarding that in Deuteronomy 4:2 12:32 so we are doubly impressed with how important that is... The Queen, via her coronation oath, swore to and is of duty to defend the laws of God with all of her power. What do you suppose the promise to be faithful and bear true allegiance is about and means in when law to her majesty the Christian Monarch head of the church of England? Hundred of thousands promise they will do that when they take a lawful oath to her... It is to aid her carry out her Coronation duties in defending the laws of God, the Church and the Clergy.
            That is her primary duty as a Christian Monarch and anyone else who says otherwise is seditious. Parliament sits as appointed directors of a corporation that trades on the New York Stock Exchange. So does every Province as they too are corporations Crown or not as the Crown itself is a Corporation based out of Fleet Street London.Crown Land Worldwide.pdf (application/pdf Object)

            The "government" we have is not the Romans 13 government as it refers to God's ministers in that chapter 3 times. No minister of God would violate his commands and add to his law! No ministers of Christ would authorize homosexual unions in marriage as it is clearly scripturally an abomination to God! and a violation of section 24 of the Statute of Westminster an in force act of the Parliament of Great Britain. EPCEW | Resources | Westminster Confession of Faith | Chapter XXIV No minister of Christ would vote to legalize abortion, no minister of Christ would allow the CRTC to promote homosexuality and pornography on the Canadian airwaves as that is sin!
            No minister of Christ would ever condone usury and taxes beyond the annual Hebrew Temple tax that Christ paid via the Fishes mouth.

            So the old but successful lie that we are to bow to false god government Using Romans 13 as the lead simply vanishes when you see God never ever intended for his government to add to his law thereby corrupting it as surely it has.

            These Charlatans sitting on the bench and writing law are a threat to the people of this country as their focus is tainted and biased... They know the reason for the false oath is so the liability of their fraud does not rise to the Queen as I believe it was her who warned them that she would not partake of their fraud upon her Coronation... She herself swore a false oath that is advertised on the Home office website. http://www.parliament.uk/documents/c...snpc-00435.pdf
            Parliament would have to be convened to amend the Coronation Oath Act and it was not. They added several words and omitted a few others. Very small changes but massive ramifications!! The oath is not lawful and they even admit it!! The whole system of the Monarchy is based upon a false oath Intend to deceive the masses. God is not to happy I am sure as he hates false oath swearers and lying lawters like our anonymous Quack here.

            Comment

            Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
            Auto-Saved
            Smile :) Stick Out Tongue :p Wink ;) Mad :mad: Big Grin :D Frown :( Embarrassment :o Confused :confused: Roll Eyes (Sarcastic) :rolleyes: Cool :cool: EEK! :eek:
            x
            Insert: Thumbnail Small Medium Large Fullsize Remove  
            x

            the color of a banana is... (write the answer twice with an "@" between the words)

            widgetinstance 213 (Related Topics) skipped due to lack of content & hide_module_if_empty option.
            Working...
            X